4/8/2023 0 Comments Splunk competitors![]() Splunk is flexible enough, he points out, that you "can abuse Splunk syntax to do anything and it kind works on long historical time scale back data." This means, Weinstein says, that "for many companies, is the ad hoc query system of last resort." Open source options may abound, he notes, but don't "give as much flexibility on query." According to Box engineer Jeff Weinstein, "misuse" is a primary driver of Splunk's continued adoption, by which he means enterprises pushing data into Splunk for jobs it may not be particularly well-suited to manage. It doesn't hurt that Splunk, unlike its open source competitors, gets pulled into all sorts of jobs for which it offers a good enough, though not perfect, fit. In other words, even if companies are embracing open source alternatives in droves, we're still going to see healthy Spunk adoption. ![]() It's taken nearly 14 years for those massive IT ships to incorporate Splunk into their tool chest, and they still continue to run BMC, CA, Tivol and Dynatrace." As such, "Even if the perfect out-of-the-box open source solution were to magically make its way onto every Splunk customer's desks, they would still use Splunk, at least for some transitionary period." As Trajman told me, "Every company that runs Splunk, was once not running Splunk. Sure, the "path to filling gaps" between Elasticsearch and Splunk may be "obvious," Trajman continues, but "executing on it is less than trivial." Nor is this the hardest problem to overcome. Iguaz founder and CTO Yaron Haviv puts it this way: "Many also look for integrated/turn-key vs DIY," with open source considered the ultimate do-it-yourself alternative. Most of the dollars being spent on Splunk are from organizations that need a complete solution and don't have the time or the talent to build a do-it-yourself alternative." The problem is that these "perfectly good open source solutions" aren't - solutions, that is.Īs Trajman went on to tell me, open source software tends to "come as a box of parts and not as a complete solution. ![]() These companies continue to sell billions of dollars a year in software license and maintenance despite perfectly good alternative open source solutions in the market." To the question of why Splunk still exists in a world awash in open source alternatives, Rocana CEO Omer Trajman didn't mince words in an interview: "We could ask the same question of the other dinosaurs that have open source alternatives: BMC, CA, Tivoli, Dynatrace. Why does Splunk exist given that "no dominant platform-level software infrastructure has emerged in the last 10 years in closed-source, proprietary form," as Cloudera co-founder Mike Olson has said? True, Splunk was founded in 2003, 10 years before Olson's declaration, but the real answer for Splunk's continued relevance may come down to both product completeness and industry inertia. Despite a sea of competitors, the best of them open source, Splunk continues to generate mountains of cash. Or rather, nearly all - Splunk, the log analysis tool, remains stubbornly, happily proprietary. All essential data infrastructure these days is open source.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |